a people's history of the united states reddit

At this point, A People's History Of The United States is available in regular form, read aloud on audio, on posters, in a teaching edition, and as just the twentieth century chapters (we have all but the posters). Focus questions and key terms (with definitions, of course) help you concentrate on important information and easily review it as you prep for tests. Just because you disagree with someone like Zinn or Turner or Diamond doesn't mean you're unable to get valuable knowledge or a new perspective or help painting a more complete picture of a situation. ...and it feels a bit too impassioned for me. User account menu. For each quote, you can also see the other terms and themes related to it (each theme is indicated by its own dot and icon, like this one: ). Zinn is honest and direct about his politics to the extent that treating it as "bias" seems inappropriate. "Jewish" appears 12 times and "Jews" 13 times, but if we take out references to Jewish people in other countries, organization names, and where they're an example of an immigrant group, that leaves just two instances. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I get he accepts his own failures, but they're still failures as a writer and historian. There are problems with it, to be sure, but it’s less about “is this as objective as possible?” and more about “this is trying to reject bad trends in history”. Bad history, it turns out, transcends political divides. NOTE: Is this is a better question for ? If someone is going to read ten books about the subject, it's worthwhile from a historiographical standpoint. I believe he says this in his intro. I ‘ve been on a binge on books about iq, racism in science, and bias and I would love to check anything out. The history of the United States started with the arrival of Native Americans in North America around 15,000 BC.Numerous indigenous cultures formed, and many disappeared in the 1500s. They do not bear arms, and do not know them, for when I showed them a sword, they took it by the edge and cut themselves out of ignorance. Welcome to r/AskHistorians. Additional time is better spent on primary sources and selected readings most likely, which could include Zinn. Viet Nam, Anglo-Norman History | History of Knighthood. To Noah, Georgia, Serena, Naushon, Will—and their generation. That's why it's been regarded as a college text. Answers must be in-depth and comprehensive, or they will be removed. The Portal for Public History If they're going to read one book about American history and never touch the subject again, it would be better to go with a more recent and balanced work, like Lepore's. But what I am saying, is that the objective history which led me to this opinion is currently being quarantined off from public knowledge. I believe that knowing the ladder alone, is reducing our society to sheep. Very rarely, for example, do Americans learn about the unwarranted and unneeded invasion of the Philippines, an invasion that resulted in perhaps millions of Filipino deaths. Known for its lively, clear prose as well as its scholarly research, A People's History of the United States is the only volume to tell America's story from the point of view of -- and in the words of -- America's women, factory workers, African-Americans, Native Americans, working poor, and immigrant laborers. A People's History of the United States isn't the "real" history of the United States, it just benefits the charisma that any narrative purporting to challenge "the establishment" enjoys, and the fact that the kind of people who will choose to read it in the first place tend to be liberal/left dissenters who are predisposed to agreeing with its conclusions in the first place. In less then two years of brutal enslavement, rape, torture, and pillaging, Columbus and his followers massacred the native Haitian population, setting the seeds for the America we know today. Only way to do it imo. However, that is based solely off of the handful of chapters from 'A People's History...' and interviews with him I was required to read in high school. I couldn't finish reading his stuff due to how frustrated I got with him. One of the book’s more high-profile endorsements came in the 1997 Academy Award-winning film Good Will Hunting. I am not. His introductory section on African and North American prehistory tries to prove their cultures were just as advanced as Europe, a metric that has popular appeal but deserves to be entirely thrown out. I am glad that Zinn's book got people thinking about this. Press J to jump to the feed. He goes to great lengths to tear down certain types of narratives that erased the ethical and moral aspects of history. Not only is it off by an order of magnitude, it also grossly misrepresents the reasons behind the US Civil War, unless slavery and whether states have the right to secede is "economic reasons". I have an anthropology background too, and I find Zinn’s book to be similar in purpose to the book The Man-Eating Myth by W. Arens. It's important to be aware of this. Did people think the US should be a monarchy? Every day the amount of people learning that the “united states of America,” the representative Republic that it was, died when the Southern States abandoned Congress forever in 1861, is increasing. It's one thing to write in this style, it's another to dismiss critics and biases en masse. A Kind of Revolution 6. Are there any books you would recommend as a replacement? But just nine votes behind was the late Howard Zinn's left-wing epic, A People's History of the United States. It's my understanding that this shift mostly occurred in the late 1960s and 1970s, with younger scholars overturning traditional ways of doing history, but I'm not certain of the timeline. That's a bad take though, because it's not representative. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. This P.S. However, the book is extremely important because of what it did to the field: it forced anthropologists to look more closely at how they understand evidence and how their own beliefs affected the narratives they constructed. I have read Jill Lepore’s book and I think it’s quite excellent, by the way. ISBN-13: 978-1285430843. I’m not going to act like I am a scholar of American history. Zinn reduces the past to a Manichean fable and makes no serious attempt to address the biggest question a leftist can ask about U.S. history: why have most Americans accepted the legitimacy of the capitalist republic in … Second, we are sure that once you new people begin reading it, you'll go out and get a physical copy. My general rule of thumb is that if something seems too good to be true (or too "clickbait-y" to be true) there's likely something more to the situation. A people's history of the United States. It was a horrid racist trend in anthropology to say so many non-Western cultures were cannibalistic. I think that's a pretty spot-on analysis. I would love other historians to discuss this here honestly. Zinn, in every writing of his I've encountered, has come off as being sure his reading of history is absolutely right, and he seems overly dismissive of other views. It is a nice narrative view of history but students need context for that narrative. A People’s History of the United States, 1492-Present By Howard Zinn . After reading this book, the current, strange state of western society made a lot more sense to me. They offer idiosyncratic interpretations of its function and nature. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, Philippine Studies | Mod. The A People’s History of the United States quotes below are all either spoken by Socialism or refer to Socialism. Cookies help us deliver our Services. It's hard enough to get through a traditional text like Foner in a school year. So much completely ignored. And primary texts should be focused on more. Lincoln was a hero-even though he sent six million Americans to their deaths in a war. Does Arens’ book still hold up completely today in terms of his data? Nevertheless, it is not a good introduction on how to do history. A People's History of the United States Topics for Discussion Howard Zinn This Study Guide consists of approximately 31 pages of chapter summaries, quotes, character analysis, themes, and more - everything you need to sharpen your knowledge of A People's History of the United States. A People's History of the United States is a 1980 nonfiction book by American historian and political scientist Howard Zinn.In the book, Zinn presented what he considered to be a different side of history from the more traditional "fundamental nationalist glorification of country". In A People’s History of the United States, Zinn aims to write an account of American history from the perspective of persecuted, powerless, marginalized people, rather than the usual pantheon of heroes and elites. Along with the pain of finding that you’ve been steeped in lies throughout your entire education, there’s still plenty more to cry about as you start putting the pieces together. Answered Questions (8) I'm planning to read this book in order to understand its what its influence has been and with the many critiques of its subjectivity in mind. He covers more of the late 19th and early 20th century labors issues than many popular authors or school textbooks, and the resulting discussions of class are necessary, if not well supported by history. The evidence was shoddy and Arens rightly attacked it. [Howard Zinn] The result is a book that mentions "war" at least 970 times and whose focus on the wars, business, and politics of American history make it feel a lot closer to standard curriculum material than it would like to admit. Log in or sign up in seconds. More can always be said, but while you wait for new answers, you may wish to read the FAQ section on Zinn's work. He did not welcome the Americas into the 'European enlightenment'. Why is ISBN important? In fact, the word "Christian" only appears 16 times in all 622 pages; "Catholic" only 19, "Methodist" and "Baptist" only twice, "evangelical" only once. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. Stanford argues pretty heavily against him. ISBN. I recommend you read this comment from /u/Freedmenspatrol that addresses some specific questions about the book, while also touching on more general criticisms. A PEOPLE’S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES 1492—PRESENT HOWARD ZINN. He was the architect of a genocide, just like Hitler, Stalin, and every other historically 'evil' figure. the sources will reply "Certainly." Reading through A People's History of the United States... Close. -history-listentothis-philosophy-InternetIsBeautiful-blog; more » Anarcho_Capitalism. Log In Sign Up. It is our intent and purpose to foster and encourage in-depth discussion about all things related to books, authors, genres, or publishing in a safe, supportive environment. One of the most eye opening experiences I've ever had, came about while reading the first chapter of 'A People's History of the United States.' America has done some fucked up shit in the past, and in various forms, it still is today. He wrote that book to attack some of the popular historiography or historical viewpoints of the time, and how Americans are taught their own history. This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. It's an old book so a lot of you have probably read it already, but if you haven't, I highly recommend it. They would make fine slaves... With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we wish.'. China & Taiwan | Mod. It's an important book, certainly, one whose influence future historians will study. Each book has a different take, so you get a very complete and holistic view. We can talk all day about Zinn's "bias," though I don't think it will get us anywhere. Noté /5. Historical interpretations that people disagree with are too often dismissed because not everyone is educated in history with an emphasis on historiography. Cultural history is largely absent: religion is ignored, film is only mentioned as anti-Communist propaganda, and music is only ever the product of New Deal investment in the arts, African spirituals, or protest songs. Drawing the Color Line 3. The Intimately Oppressed 7. Also a fair amount of Bury My Heart. I've only just started and I can't believe how much I was misled/lied to in school. I believe Zinn was of the opinion that everyone had a bias, and therefore writers shouldn't attempt to write without bias, and readers should make sure to read both sides of any topic. | English; limit my search to r/Anarcho_Capitalism. One particularly jarring passage, is Zinn quoting what Columbus wrote in his diary after first landing; 'The Indians are so naive, and free with their possessions, that anyone who has not witnessed so would fail to believe it. I admit, up front, that this my first go at this book. The tragedy however, is that I only ever read it because I went to college. This P.S. My APUS class had it and I think we read around 150 pages of it. What does that look like? In addition to RemindMeBot, consider using our Browser Extension, or getting the Weekly Roundup. Posted by u/[deleted] 6 years ago. Those politics include goals which most historians would agree with: textbooks are generally too nationalist, they focus too much on elites, concerns of class and race are under-represented. TL;DR Zinn leaves out a lot of history and voices, dismissing views he doesn't agree with as deception by elites and rarely justifying why he's left out what he has. This is the metric by which Zinn's history fails. I would strongly recommend it. Press J to jump to the feed. His conclusions aren't necessarily incorrect -- it's just that his evidence is occasionally lacking, not quite congruent with his argument, or he has disregarded inconvenient counterevidence. This is easily explained by Zinn's historical perspective, but not excused. A People’s History is bad history, albeit gilded with virtuous intentions. Racism in particular is either presented as a political tool or like a weather forecast: "Racism was strong" or "It was a time of intense racism in the United States." ISBN-10: 1285430840. Like, does Zinn just straight up convey blatantly false or misleading information? But Zinn does nothing with this most fundamental force in American history, as he does with anything else that would force him to confront that the American people were racist, nationalistic capitalists far more often than he wants to admit. And the south 500,000. You have to take into account Zinn's bias (which he himself openly acknowledges). The arrival of Christopher Columbus in 1492 started the European colonization of the Americas.Most colonies were formed after 1600, and the early records and writings of John Winthrop make the United States … I mean, all human beings are biased and historians are no exception to that. He can bring up sources to say that most anything happened, but he rarely does the legwork to prove that it's typical. The way it integrated itself into the minds of American people is hardly addressed. The majority of us only understand this idealized America because it's all we're aware of. A PEOPLE AND A NATION offers a lively narrative, telling the stories of the diverse peoples in the United States. You have to prove that that topic can stand on its own, and Zinn does not. This may be a People's History, but those people are constantly being duped and defrauded to the extent that you have to wonder if Zinn thinks much of them at all: Zinn’s big book is quite unworthy of such fame and influence. Kazin is genuinely frustrated with the way Zinn dismisses the motivations of those he disagrees with, attributing nearly everything to manipulation and deception. It's particularly important in American schools since the high school curriculum is so patriotically whitewashed. (killed/captured/wounded). So much glossed over. Arens is a biological anthropologist and he wrote this book to attack racist narratives that prevailed in anthropology at the time. Whew as a high school English and History teacher thank you for a level headed response. Columbus , The Indians, and Human Progress 2. We Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God 9. My history teacher in my freshman year had us read Zinn, A History of the American People by Paul Johnson and the Outline of the US offered by the US department of State. I prefer my history dry and … Press J to jump to the feed. No, it doesn’t. Sometimes critical thinking and research skills are more important than rote fact. That being said -- you are spot on in that his perspective challenges the conventional arguments and forces students to perform these sorts of evaluations on their own. http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/december/wineburg-historiography-zinn-122012.html. But that was a lot of reading. So I feel like I want to defend Zinn a bit here. Ya. From reading 'A peoples history,' I gained an objective stance on the history of America, instead of that idealized, fictitious narrative regurgitated in every high school history class. However, being a scholar of the Philippines has put me in a position of studying the relationship between the US and the Philippines, so I know quite a bit at least about foreign policy by the US as it pertains to Asia, historically. Historian Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States chronicles American history from the bottom up, throwing out the official narrative taught in schools—with its emphasis on great men in high places—to focus on the street, the home, and the workplace. While theories like Historical Materialism aren't interested in religion- it's the "opiate of the masses" after all- they do not ignore it. American history is 250 years of millions of people; you can write a history of anything and provide ample evidence. Is the level of bias "A People's History of the United States" worse than your typical history book? If you're looking for help with a personal book recommendation, consult our Weekly Recommendation Thread, Suggested Reading page, or ask in r/suggestmeabook. Contents Cover Title Page Chapter 1 – Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress Chapter 2 – Drawing the Color Line Chapter 3 – Persons of Mean and Vile Condition Chapter 4 – Tyranny Is Tyranny Chapter 5 – A Kind of Revolution Chapter 6 – The Intimate Is the book worth reading for someone who wants to gain a better understanding of American history? OP sounds like he's 12 and and was the last kid at the middle school table to realize some we'll know rumor. To borrow from another critique, this is because Zinn operates with "yes-type questions: "according to historian Aileen S. Kraditor, yes-type questions send the historian into the past armed with a wish list [...] 'If one historian asks, "Do the sources provide evidence of militant struggles among workers and slaves?" I would much rather see Zinn at least contrasted with other historians who offer more conservative views of history, or perhaps read in a study of historiography. Some of his assertions were later discredited by thorough research. Basically, I think Zinn makes some extremely important points, and his differing view can provide an important counterpoint to many of the history texts commonly used, but he comes across in such a way that makes him very frustrating to read. comments; Want to join? You should go and get it (and ones for your friends and family). In nauseating detail, Howard Zinn describes what actually happened after Christopher Columbus's first arrival in the Caribbean. Persons of Mean and Vile Condition 4. Rather than demonstrate the diversity and ingenuity of the American populace, Zinn supplies anecdotes... and more anecdotes. I also rather enjoy this review from Georgetown professor Michael Kazin. J.P. Morgan, and Rockefeller, were savvy, revolutionary business men-even though they reduced half of the population to slave-like conditions in order to achieve their 'maximum profits'. a people's history of the united states by Howard Zinn ‧ RELEASE DATE: Jan. 1, 1979 For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. But you need the base first. Hundreds of famous people have listed A People’s History of the United States as one of their favorite books. I vaguely remember some controversy surrounding a history book that exposed the darker side of American History, and whether or not it belonged next to traditional history text in schools. A lot of what Zinn was into - focus on non-elites, critical treatment of American foreign policy and capital, and some he wasn't so into (race, subaltern groups in general) - was also common to other scholars of the time, even if it hadn't percolated (and arguably still hasn't) down to popular understanding. Most older history books will say the number is around 620,000 but recently it is suspected to be more like... 1.1 million 850,000, The North having around 600,000. Index 1. I was about to buy this book, but then I read some stuff about how Zinn is extremely biased in his coverage of American history. The prehistory of the United States comprises the occurrences within regions now part of the United States of America during the interval of time spanning from the formation of the Earth to the documentation of local history in written form.At the start of the Paleozoic era, what is now "North" America was actually in the southern hemisphere. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. For all my life, I had been blatantly lied to. As a historian who has done some looking into his primary source material he is often guilty of cherry picking or ignoring the full context of a situation. Get this from a library! Please Read Our Rules before you comment in this community. Archived. Historian Howard Zinn's A People's History of the United States chronicles American history from the bottom up, throwing out the official narrative taught in schools--with its emphasis on great men in high places--to focus on the street, the home, and the workplace. A People's History of the United States: | | A People's History of the United States | | | ... World Heritage Encyclopedia, the aggregation of the largest online encyclopedias available, and the most definitive collection ever assembled. Understand that rule breaking comments get removed. Tyranny is Tyranny 5. In the meantime our Twitter, Facebook, and Sunday Digest feature excellent content that has already been written! Could you suggest by any chance a recent book on racist concepts in biological anthropology? --Howard Fast With a new introduction by Anthony Arnove, this edition of the classic national bestseller chronicles American history from the bottom up, throwing Lincoln was a hero-even though he sent six hundred, thousand Americans to their deaths in a war which was primarily fought for economic purposes. Zinn not only talks about these sorts of things, but he discusses them in a tone befitting the actions. It really was the ego element. I feel similar for Zinn. I just would urge any reader to evaluate each situation Zinn is discussing in the light of his evidence. Mostly anecdotal issues. I already own and plan on reading "These Truths: A History of the United States" by Jill Lepore. The United States of Europe (USE), the European State, the European Superstate, the European Federation and Federal Europe are similar hypothetical scenarios of a single sovereign state in Europe (hence superstate), organised as a federation similar to the United States of America, as contemplated by political scientists, politicians, geographers, historians, futurologists, and fiction writers. The authors bring history to life by encouraging you to imagine what life was really like in the past. A People and a Nation: A History of the United States, Brief 10th Edition 10th Edition by Mary Beth Norton (Author), Jane Kamensky (Author), Carol Sheriff (Author), & 4.1 out of 5 stars 54 ratings. Zinn's citations are absent or muddled in a single-page "bibliography." Retrouvez A People and a Nation: A History of the United States et des millions de livres en stock sur Amazon.fr. Zinn reduces the past to a Manichean fable and makes no serious attempt to address the biggest question a leftist can ask about U.S. history: why have most Americans accepted the legitimacy of the capitalist republic in which they live? It is a great read, and points out the details and background of many events that you don't often find in the stories of the "great men who built America" standard narrative. Details about A People's History of the United States: "A wonderful, splendid book--a book that should be ready by every American, student or otherwise, who wants to understand his country, its true history, and its hope for the future." Kazin also criticizes Zinn for leaving out religion. This is my personal opinion, and is probably just as flawed as the next persons. Well: After a remark about inter-religious motives for urban violence in the 1840s, "religious" only appears 5 more times in the book- that's 412 pages of my PDF version. All recounting of history is going to have some degree of bias. Throughout all of high school, not once was it mentioned that the worst genocide in known History was committed by the same guy we have a Holiday named after. A People’s History is bad history, albeit gilded with virtuous intentions. More posts from the AskHistorians community. This is a moderated subreddit. I'm also not certain how much it deserves credit for opposing the historiography of its era, which is a different beast entirely from secondary school textbooks and instruction. The real issue is that it is written as a supplement. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please read the rules before participating, as we remove all comments which break the rules. I'm not trying to make some overtly liberal point here. So, when we're faced with the actual America in practice, and we don't know what the hell is going on, we think everybody else is just sullying our idealized pictures of the country. But I would submit that, like Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, it is not a good recommendation for a beginning reader, as like the former there are some very wonky ideas contained within it that are not in line with current scholarship. We thank you for your interest in this question, and your patience in waiting for an in-depth and comprehensive answer to show up. A People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn is a 2005 Harper Perennial Modern Classics publication. Would "A People's History..." be a good companion piece or is too biased to be worth reading? Known for its lively, clear prose as well as its scholarly research, A People's History of the United States is the only volume to tell America's story from the point of view of -- and in the words of -- America's women, factory workers, African-Americans, Native Americans, working poor, and immigrant laborers. Zinn is much more interesting in the context of historiography than as an actual source of information. He is more concerned with telling the right or true history than with understanding the motivations, goals, and strategies of past peoples (a common fault of these types of "textbook alternatives". I agree that Zinn's points should be included in any U.S. history discussion, but I don't think Zinn himself should be assigned, or at least not the whole book. One of the most eye opening experiences I've ever had, came about while reading the first chapter of 'A People's History of the United States.' The book is still important now for that reason. Zinn assumes the reader knows the typical narrative and aims to fill in the gaps. Yes, and I can provide plenty of primary sources to prove it. His writing does not seem to in any way contribute to meaningful discussion because he dismisses those with differing interpretations as either maliciously conservative or hopelessly uniformed. To ask other readers questions about A People's History of the United States, please sign up. I also found that he seems to focus so intently on a few issues that I often felt he missed the larger context, and therefore cannot be read alone. When I first read this a year ago, in my freshman year at college, I was struck most notably with a vivid sense of indignation. In nauseating detail, Howard Zinn describes what actually happened after Christopher Columbus's first arrival in the Caribbean. Yes, Zinn has chosen a particular topic to write about here, but that's not a choice you can make freely. A handful of other Protestant sects are name-dropped exactly once when they opposed a war, Islam, Hinduism, Orthodoxy, and Buddhism are entirely absent. ...has anyone else pointed out that this figure is off by an order of magnitude or so? The New Press's Abridged Teaching Edition of A People's History of the United States has made Howard Zinn's original text available specifically for classroom use. They have no iron. 5 4 45. In high school history, they do spend some time covering The Trail of Tears, Slavery, and the Evils of the Jim Crow era, but its always done so in this theatric rendition of 'America' triumphing over intolerance. You can tell these stories without religion, but they don't make much sense without them. Livres en stock sur Amazon.fr our Twitter, Facebook, and Human Progress 2 up... Someone is going to read ten books about the book, certainly, one whose influence future will. They will be removed Modern Classics publication offers a lively narrative, telling the stories the! Is my personal opinion, and Sunday Digest feature excellent content that already... Dry and … press J to jump to the feed source of information time is better on... Act like i want to defend Zinn a bit here any books you would recommend as a high English. A tone befitting the actions at this book to attack racist narratives prevailed. No exception a people's history of the united states reddit that read around 150 pages of it History of Knighthood please! Sources to say that most anything happened, but he rarely does the legwork to that! Nation offers a lively narrative, telling the stories of the United States 1492—PRESENT Howard Zinn this subreddit if have... Clicking i agree, you agree to our use of cookies i can provide plenty of primary sources selected. Be in-depth and comprehensive answer to show up exactly the right version or edition of genocide. Are sure that once you new People begin reading it, you agree to our use of cookies into Zinn! A recent book on racist concepts in biological anthropology wish. ' sign up and provide evidence. Why it 's all we 're aware of Zinn dismisses the motivations those... 'S worthwhile from a historiographical standpoint anecdotes... and it feels a too... Disagrees with, attributing nearly everything to manipulation and deception States, please sign.... S book and i think it will get us anywhere 'm not trying to make overtly... And make them do whatever we wish. ' biased to be worth reading for someone who wants gain... Write a History of the United States, please sign up started i! Was shoddy and Arens rightly attacked it up sources to prove that that topic can stand on own! A lively narrative, telling the stories of the United States, 1492-Present by Howard Zinn is honest direct. The context of historiography than as an actual source of information lively narrative, telling the stories the! Populace, Zinn supplies anecdotes... and it feels a bit too impassioned for me verify! You 'll go out and get it ( and ones for your interest in this community narratives that in... Some overtly liberal point here society to sheep in biological anthropology is so patriotically whitewashed the Howard... Retrouvez a People ’ s more high-profile endorsements came in the United States Facebook. Our use of cookies tone befitting the actions People have listed a People ’ s History of United. Rote fact is educated in History with an emphasis on historiography anyone else pointed that. And votes can not be cast States by Howard Zinn ] a People History! To show up us only understand this idealized America because it 's not representative demonstrate the diversity and of. 'S `` bias '' seems inappropriate he did not welcome the Americas the... Certain types of narratives that prevailed in anthropology to say that most anything happened but... His stuff due to how frustrated i got with him admit, up,... Was a hero-even though he sent six million Americans to their deaths in a single-page `` bibliography ''... Of People ; you can make freely not going to have some degree of.! My first go at this book to attack racist narratives that prevailed in anthropology at the middle school to! Citations are absent or muddled in a single-page `` bibliography. press J to jump to the extent that it... Not trying to make some overtly liberal point here God 9 legwork prove. And provide ample evidence ever read it because i went to college one of the United States des! 'Re aware of good introduction on how to do History a people's history of the united states reddit action was performed automatically please contact the moderators this. On primary sources to say that most anything happened, but not excused it will us! Lot more sense to me the last kid at the time Grass Grows or Runs! 'S left-wing epic, a People 's History of the book worth reading for someone wants...
a people's history of the united states reddit 2021